Image: Facebook/jamielee.crane
Not many times a FIFO worker sues a mining operator — and wins. But that’s exactly what happened recently when a fly-in fly-out miner was unfairly dismissed from a Western Australian gold mine, only to be rewarded with more than $70,000 in pay-out by the Fair Work Commission after ruling that the company’s actions were both harsh and unfair.
For FIFO workers and the rest of the mining community, this case is ringing true very loudly.
The Mt Ida Fiasco: Gold Goes Missing, Blame Follows
Source: Facebook/Instagram
It started in the Mt Ida gold mine, run by Aurenne Management Services. In the standard crew handover procedure, a gold-bearing material — worth some $20,000 — went unreported.
What should have been a straightforward exercise of recording and uploading the content became a finger-pointing exercise. And it wasn’t long before one of the employees was singled out.
That one FIFO worker, with years on the job and no record of wrongdoing, was told he was being sacked for a breakdown in procedure. The company claimed he had failed to properly document the handover — a mistake they claimed cost them thousands of dollars’ worth of lost gold.
But when the matter was before the Fair Work Commission, the tale unfolded quickly.
Fair Work Commission Weighs In: Not So Simple After All
Commissioner Bruce Williams, who handled the case, was no diplomat. According to his report, there was no definite proof that the worker intentionally or at least negligently brought about the loss.
Indeed, the real issue seemed to run deeper — within the company itself and its procedures.
There were training gaps. Crews had patchy communication. And most seriously, there were no standard procedures which might have prevented the error in being made in the first instance.
In short, the employee had been allowed to go through a high-stress process without the necessary equipment — and then disciplined when something went wrong.
A Harsh Decision Without Proper Process
One of the most incriminating aspects of the case was the way in which the dismissal was carried out. The employee wasn’t afforded the right to defend himself. No proper investigation was conducted. And the company didn’t even think about alternatives to dismissal — namely a warning, retraining, or redeployment.
They went straight to dismissal.
For Commissioner Williams, this raised serious concerns.
He concluded that while the company may have understandably been concerned about the lost gold, their response was not commensurate. The punishment just wasn’t commensurate with the alleged mistake — especially for an otherwise trouble-free employee.
A $70,000 Wake-Up Call
The case was ruled in favor of the employee, ordering the company to pay him $70,000. The amount indicated the lost wages, the emotional stress, and the financial burden that wrongful and hasty dismissal could bring.
It wasn’t just a payment – it was a message.
FIFO mining operations, particularly those that entail FIFO employees in remote and high-stress environments, have to be confident that their internal procedures are well comprehended, fair, and appropriately enforced.
The Human Side of FIFO Work
This case has resonated with many individuals in the FIFO industry. These are already employees who are isolated, under long rosters, and who have mental illness problems, often hundreds of kilometres away from residence and support bases.
Being dismissed summarily without explanation or procedural safeguards only serves to sharpen that tension.
In fact, industry allies contend this case represents a larger problem: how some mining companies react to errors or accidents, often assigning blame down the line rather than confronting structural issues.
“FIFO workers are owed as much procedural fairness as anyone else,” said one union official. “You can’t simply fire someone for a procedural mistake when you haven’t even trained and equipped them well enough to do it right.”
Why This Case Matters Beyond Mt Ida
Although the case was about a particular event, its ramifications reach far wider.
It upholds the importance of thoroughly documented handover procedures, good training programs, and — above all — fair disciplinary procedures. It also dispels the impression that all responsibility is ever in the hands of the officer on the ground.
In industries like mining, which operate 24/7 and where handovers are critical, it’s critical that everyone, from crew to top managers, is au fait with systems in place. When those systems break down, singling out one worker as the culprit is not just unfair but unsustainable as well.
Final Word: A Lesson in Accountability
Ultimately, the Mt Ida dispute serves as a reminder that fairness in the workplace matters — however remote and brutal that work might be.
As mining companies fight to find ways to accommodate the difficulties of running complex operations in challenging environments, they must also not forget the human faces behind the work — the hi-visibility-wearing souls, labouring on site, getting the job done.
This is not going to turn the industry on its head overnight, but it’s a positive step. And for one FIFO worker, it’s even better than that — it’s justice.
Crafmin.com – Real-time news and insights in Crypto, Mining, Tech, AI, Forex, and Global Markets.
